So… now, it’s a race thing?
In a striking display of selective compassion, the Trump administration has delivered 59 white South African refugees to the United States — at a time when virtually all other refugee admissions have been frozen. Roughly five dozen Afrikaners — descendants of Dutch colonizers — landed at Dulles Airport, reportedly to be resettled across conservative-friendly enclaves [...]

In a striking display of selective compassion, the Trump administration has delivered 59 white South African refugees to the United States — at a time when virtually all other refugee admissions have been frozen. Roughly five dozen Afrikaners — descendants of Dutch colonizers — landed at Dulles Airport, reportedly to be resettled across conservative-friendly enclaves in the U.S. It would be just another immigration footnote, if not for the hypocrisy it so clearly illustrates: a U.S. refugee program that slams the door on brown and Black asylum seekers, while chartering a plane and holding the door open for white ones.
So, now it’s about race?
The Biden administration didn’t build this architecture — but Trump has returned to it gleefully, ratcheting up a rabid immigration policy designed to make America whiter, more exclusionary, and more ideologically hostile to the reality of a multiracial democracy. Refugee policy has now become racial preference policy. The very notion of refuge has been perverted: it is no longer about who faces the most danger, but who best fits a preferred national identity.
A Charter Flight of Hypocrisy
The arrival of the 59 Afrikaner refugees marks a moment of racialized immigration theatrics. While thousands of vetted refugees from Syria, Congo, Haiti, and Afghanistan remain in limbo, Trump has resurrected the idea that “white displacement” is the true humanitarian crisis. This is not a humanitarian gesture. It is political theater. It is whiteness as a global identity, packaged and flown first-class through U.S. immigration law.
In February, Trump issued an order directing immigration authorities to prioritize Afrikaners, claiming they are victims of racial discrimination in South Africa. The U.S. State Department and South African government both refuted these claims, noting that while South Africa faces high crime and inequality, there is no evidence of systemic persecution against whites. On the contrary, whites in South Africa still control most of the country’s wealth and land. The average white household owns over 20 times the wealth of the average Black household.
Yet the U.S. administration saw fit to bypass thousands of non-white refugees with confirmed need and instead stage a PR-friendly refugee rollout, complete with airport arrival photos and curated media coverage. This is not about crisis; this is about optics. This is about validating the lie that white people are under global siege, and that America exists as their final sanctuary.
Selective Empathy, Selective Memory
The United States has a long history of racial preference in its refugee policy. During the Cold War, white Cuban exiles were welcomed as heroes, while Haitian refugees were denied asylum and sent back. In modern times, Trump’s “Muslim ban” targeted travelers and refugees from Muslim-majority countries, banning entire populations from entering the U.S. based solely on religion and race.
But with the Afrikaner airlift, we’re seeing a newer kind of refugee: the culturally sympathetic white conservative. Not only are they let in, they’re put on pedestals, presented as victims of Black-led governments, elevated as symbols of “reverse racism” for the Fox News audience. Meanwhile, Muslim refugees, African asylum seekers, and displaced families from Central America are treated with suspicion, criminalized, and deported.
Trump’s selective empathy is deliberate. It’s a strategy meant to signal to white Americans that the government will prioritize them, globally. It is a betrayal of the moral foundation of refugee protections.
Apartheid’s Echo in America
To call this moment ironic would be an understatement. South Africa’s apartheid regime was modeled in part on American Jim Crow laws. The shared legacy between U.S. and South African Black communities is deep and enduring. Martin Luther King Jr. and Nelson Mandela drew strength from one another’s movements. Black Americans rallied for Mandela’s freedom. Yet now, decades after apartheid’s end, the U.S. is offering sanctuary to its former beneficiaries.
What message does this send to the rest of the world? That losing power in a post-colonial democracy is grounds for U.S. asylum? That whiteness is an internationally protected status, one that transcends national borders? Afrikaners aren’t being rescued from persecution. They’re being rescued from equality.
Whose Refuge? Whose Nation?
The Statue of Liberty promises refuge to the tired, poor, huddled masses. But in Trump’s America, it now seems to whisper, “unless you’re Black or brown.” The Afrikaner airlift is proof that the administration is crafting immigration policy based not on threat or humanitarian need, but on race, cultural compatibility, and political optics.
What about the Rohingya Muslims fleeing genocide? What about Sudanese and Congolese refugees fleeing war and sexual violence? What about Haitian families seeking shelter from political collapse and natural disaster? These are people with legitimate, documented claims of persecution. But they are ignored — not because they don’t qualify, but because they don’t fit.
From the center, from those who once believed America might stand for fairness, this feels like a betrayal. From the margins, it is a continuation of the same legacy: whiteness prioritized, others denied. For every Afrikaner placed into a new home with federal support, there is a Congolese mother sitting in a camp, forgotten. For every MAGA-capped South African refugee smiling at Dulles, there is a Yemeni child barred from entry.
Let’s Be Clear
This isn’t about helping people. This is about protecting whiteness.
Let us say this plainly: the 59 Afrikaners may have stepped onto American soil, but their arrival was not an act of justice. It was an act of politics. And it speaks volumes that, in the middle of a so-called refugee freeze, the Trump administration made one glaring exception. The race of the arrivals explains everything.
America must decide what kind of refuge it wants to be: one grounded in need, or one grounded in racial preference. This moment is a test. And the results are already landing at our airports.
— Alex Haynes, The Unmuted Report