A House Democrat Is Proposing an Amendment to Reverse the Supreme Court

There’s been quite the shakeup in Washington over the last month. If you’re tuned into the political world, you understand it seems that the Democrats have done nothing but panic. A closer look reveals that there may be more happening behind the scenes.

What We Know:

• As a reaction to a recent Supreme Court decision conferring broad immunity on the presidency, a prominent Democratic member of the House, Representative Joseph Morelle from New York, has announced plans to propose a constitutional amendment. This proposed amendment, which aims to nullify the court’s ruling, reflects Morelle’s commitment to ensuring that no president is beyond legal accountability.
• The Supreme Court’s decision, led by Chief Justice John Roberts, posits that presidents generally possess comprehensive immunity from criminal prosecution for actions undertaken during their tenure. This ruling has significant implications, particularly impacting ongoing legal proceedings against former President and convicted felon, Donald Trump, including allegations related to his endeavors to influence the 2020 election results.
• The court’s decision has provoked strong reactions, including vigorous dissent from its liberal justices who highlight potential dangers to democratic governance. Morelle’s proposed amendment is seen as the most formidable legislative reaction to the court’s conservative majority’s ruling, which was surprising to many in Washington.
• In his communication with fellow representatives, Morelle expressed that his resolution aims to address what he views as a failure by the Supreme Court to protect democratic values. He explicitly cited the need for accountability for all public officers, including the president, echoing dissenting opinions from Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.
• Despite the ambitious objective, the path to amending the Constitution is notably challenging, requiring a two-thirds majority in both the House and Senate, followed by ratification by three-quarters of the state legislatures. This formidable process reflects the stringent requirements set forth to alter this foundational document, which has only been amended 27 times.

• Simultaneously, Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has voiced intentions to initiate impeachment proceedings against justices involved in the ruling, describing it as a direct assault on American democratic principles. Her strong stance underscores the broader legislative discontent with the ruling’s implications for presidential accountability.

The unfolding scenario underscores a critical moment in U.S. governance, as lawmakers grapple with the balance between judicial interpretations and the foundational principles of accountability and rule of law in the nation’s highest offices.