Would Iyanla Vanzant Invite R. Kelly To Her Thanksgiving?

As families finalize their Thanksgiving dinner invites, last year’s controversial debate around going no contact and cutting ties with difficult relatives has reemerged with an added layer about whether known predators should be invited to holiday family gatherings. 

Spiritual teacher Iyanla Vanzant’s recent suggestion during an interview that she and other elders in the Black community owe singer R. Kelly an apology for failing to protect and guide him before he committed and was convicted of sexual offenses, serves as a public reminder of this familial inclination to accommodate abusers and compromise the safety and well-being of the entire household. 

Vanzant went so far as to address Kelly directly through the interview, asking him to forgive her as a community elder for ignoring his pain, not supporting him, and abandoning him. At one point during the interview, she goes as far as talking about his illiteracy saying, “The man couldn’t even read. How many people made money on him and nobody had enough compassion for their brother to sit him down two, three times a week to teach him how to read?” 

Vanzant’s framing shifts accountability away from Kelly, who is currently serving a 30-year federal prison sentence for racketeering and child sex offenses, and into a territory of collective community guilt where the Black community is being asked to assume responsibility for his actions. 

Vanzant’s inclination to center the narrative and her attention on the perpetrator and hand Kelly a pass because of his background rather than offering support to Kelly’s victims reflects a widespread pattern seen often in the Black community, but not exclusive to it, where a perpetrator is protected and shielded at the expense of the safety of the larger community. 

As a self-professed community elder who built her career on facilitating healing and promoting the safety and well being of Black folks, Vanzant should be focusing her attention on addressing the adults who committed and enabled the abuse. She should be coming out in support of the survivors of Kelly’s crimes, confronting the parents who gave Kelly unfettered access to their underage daughters, and helping survivors heal from the effects of the abuse while also teaching the community how to stay safe moving forward.  

As the holiday season rolls around and families are deciding who is hosting Thanksgiving dinner and who’s invited, Vanzant’s public defense of Kelly highlights a broader, quiet pattern that represents a faction within the Black community that is committed to rationalizing or shielding perpetrators rather than advocating for victims, enforcing clear boundaries, and putting an end to cycles of abuse. 

The proclivity among the Black community to shield perpetrators is often rooted in a protective reflex to guard Black men from a hostile and punitive criminal legal system in larger society. By misinterpreting racial solidarity as an obligation to absorb internal harm, families treat the household as a fortress, incorrectly believing that keeping a predator close or surrounded by family can effectively serve as a form of community-based rehabilitation. 

At the heart of this accommodation is a complex blend of cognitive dissonance and misplaced empathy that distorts how families process severe harm. When a relative is a known predator, confronting the truth and their darkness requires a more incisive look into familial cycles of abuse, a painful process that many elders choose to avoid. 

Instead, they compartmentalize the abuse and separate the uncle or successful cousin from their predatory behavior, choosing to focus on their familiar role and bloodline ties rather than the danger they pose. 

This thinking is driven by an avoidant psychological defense where the family views the perpetrator as an unhealed product of the family structure who requires rescue, unconditional love, and protection. By reframing the predator as a relative who is still deserving and in need of family love and support, the family trades the responsibility of protecting the household for the illusion of healing the abuser rather than holding them accountable. 

This dynamic often forces survivors into accepting exposure driven by the false belief that because the offense occurred years ago, the predator is no longer an active threat to them. To avoid accusations of being difficult or fracturing family or holiday unity, survivors frequently capitulate, internalizing the acute anxiety of a hyper-vigilant trauma response to preserve a comfortable lie for the collective family unit. 

When it comes to how predators are handled around family gatherings, mental health advocates emphasize that inviting abusers into family spaces is profoundly damaging to survivors and children because it undermines their sense of safety, puts them in harm’s way, and increases the risk of future abuse. 

Years ago, the reality of this danger became clear at a holiday gathering I attended with a former partner. A cousin who she’d openly accused of sexually abusing her years before continued to be invited to holiday celebrations. Because the family had kept the abuse quiet and swept it under the rug to maintain a veneer of harmony, it was nonnegotiable that the cousin remained a fixture on the guest list. 

Over the course of this particular holiday, his behavior shifted from passive presence to active predation. He was seen staring inappropriately at my ex-partner and a teenage cousin sitting nearby. He had spent the afternoon engaging in subtle grooming tactics with underage family members, testing boundaries by offering unsolicited attention, isolating younger relatives in brief conversations, and making inappropriate comments about another teenage girl cousin’s attire and shape. 

When the maternal head of the household was pulled aside and confronted about his presence and behavior, her immediate response was a dismissive compromise. She said she would simply, “keep an eye on him.”

Relying on surveillance reveals a fundamental lack of understanding of what behaviors contribute to predatory behavior. A festive, fast-moving environment filled with cooking, conversation, and constant distraction shouldn’t also serve as a forensic monitoring unit led by a busy hostess. 

“Keeping an eye” on an abuser fails because predation doesn’t require total isolation. Grooming often occurs in plain sight through calculated psychological manipulation, whispered comments, and boundary-testing that a distracted room and hostess can easily miss, and it abdicates the family from its primary responsibility to cultivate an environment where everyone, but especially young people, are safe. 

Instead of creating a safe environment, welcoming predators into family gatherings forces survivors to police their own surroundings, normalizes the abuser’s presence, and leaves the next generation vulnerable to a new cycle of abuse and harm. 

For Black matriarchs and family leaders, breaking these generational cycles means rejecting the mandate to carry trauma for the sake of an unbroken table. True rehabilitation requires professional help and forensic accountability that families and a casual indulgence of a holiday dinner can’t provide. 

We need to stop forcing victims into situations where they are reminded of being hurt and unprotected all for the sake of family. Healing can’t take root while an abuser’s comfort is prioritized over a survivor’s peace. Removing a perpetrator restores safety, order, and signals to all invited that the boundaries they need to feel safe are nonnegotiable. 

Protecting the legacy of a family and the safety of its members requires elders to use their front doors as shields. Implementing an immediate zero-tolerance policy ensures that the holiday home serves as a place of genuine sanctuary and refuge for everyone inside, regardless of age or gender. 

After all, when it comes to the lead-up and planning around Thanksgiving dinner, the most stressful conversation shouldn’t be about whether a predator should be welcomed then seated across from a survivor. It should be about which aunt needs to make the macaroni and cheese and which aunt should only be entrusted with bringing ice and soda.

SEE ALSO:

Let’s Talk About The Battle Over Who Does Black Women’s Hair

Beyond The Myth Of The Unbreakable Black Woman [Op-Ed]